Oral statements delivered by DefendDefenders at the 42nd session of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC42, 9-27 September 2019)
Item 6: Adoption of the report on the UPR of Ethiopia (20 September 2019)
DefendDefenders welcomes the acceptance by the Government of Ethiopia of a large number of UPR recommendations. Last May, Ethiopia’s review was a milestone for human rights advancement in the country – the first UPR review for which meaningful consultations were conducted with a range of national stakeholders and the first that has the potential of contributing to systemic human rights reforms. We salute the fact that the Ethiopian Government displayed political will to engage on human rights challenges, including past and ongoing violations. The climate in the country drastically improved since its second UPR review. We warmly welcome Ethiopia’s engagement with civil society, at the national, regional, and international levels.
We welcome Ethiopia’s acceptance of recommendations on:
- Ratifying core international human rights instruments to which it is not yet a Party, including the conventions on enforced disappearances (CPED) and migrant workers (ICMW). We however encourage Ethiopia to reconsider its position on recommendations no. 163.11 to 163. 14 and no. 163.17 to 163.25. Ratifying the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and Optional Protocols to ICCPR, the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and CEDAW would send a powerful message to all Ethiopian citizens;
- Conducting comprehensive legal reform. We salute Ethiopia’s commitment to ensure that the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation (ATP) and legislation on mass media and computer crimes are brought into line with human rights standards. We can mention accepted recommendations no. 163.56 to 163.59 and 163.62. We also salute the adoption of a new CSO Proclamation that provides more space to civil society;
- Creating and maintaining an open civic space. Acceptance of recommendations no. 163.60, 163.219 and 163.220 is a positive signal in this regard; and
- Ensuring accountability for violations. Recommendation no. 163.154 (“[…] ensure that accountability constitutes the core of ongoing political reforms”) is of symbolic significance, as is the acceptance of recommendations on combating torture and abuses of power.
We regret that Ethiopia did not go a step further in its replies and did not offer a standing invitation to all Human Rights Council special procedure mandate-holders. It is not too late, as the UPR is an ongoing process. We encourage the Government to reconsider its position on all “noted” recommendations.
Item 4: General debate (18 September 2019)
DefendDefenders will address Burundi and South Sudan during the dedicated interactive dialogues under item 4, as well as Somalia and Sudan under item 10.
We highlight the ongoing gross, widespread, systematic, and systemic human rights violations committed in Eritrea, and once again regret that diplomatic progress, which is an opportunity for people of the region, has not translated into domestic progress.
As a new chapter may be opening in the Horn of Africa, human rights advancements are being secured, and Governments are engaging with civil society at the national and international levels, including here on the margins of the Human Rights Council, we reiterate our call on the Eritrean Government to fulfil its membership obligations and grant the Special Rapporteur and other special procedure mandate-holders access to the country, as a first step towards human rights reforms.
At its 41st session, this Council decided to maintain a high level of scrutiny over the country. The Eritrean Government should heed the message sent, including by engaging on the “benchmarks for progress” identified by the Special Rapporteur, and multiple calls to change course, including that outlined in a letter to President Afwerki signed by more than 100 African thinkers, writers, and human rights advocates. They deserve more than a blanket denial and insults.
Thank you for your attention.
Item 4: Interactive dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry on Burundi (17 September 2019)
Mr. President, dear Members of the Commission of Inquiry,
DefendDefenders thanks you for your report, which once again demonstrates the need for continued attention to Burundi’s human rights situation. The Commission of Inquiry is the only existing mechanism to monitor and publicly report on the situation, and its mandate should be extended to allow it to pursue its important work.
As this Council meets in Geneva, in Burundi, violations of civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights – including possible crimes against humanity – continue to be committed with impunity. Independent and critical voices, including civil society members, human rights defenders and journalists, have been particularly targeted. In July, the Ntahangwa Court of Appeal upheld the outrageous 32-year prison sentence against Germain Rukuki. With 2020 elections approaching, as the limited civic and democratic space in the country and the intimidation exercised by the Government, the ruling party, and members of the Imbonerakure hamper the prospects for a free and fair election, the scrutiny provided by the Commission remains vitally important.
As Burundi’s crisis was triggered by the 2015 presidential election and most violations, in the words of the Commission, are essentially “political in nature,” Council Members and Observers should dedicate specific attention to elections and risk factors of human rights violations and abuses.
What more can be done to promote the risk factors and indicators identified in your report, as well as a holistic prevention and early warning approach, within the UN system and beyond?
Thank you for your attention.
Item 4: Interactive dialogue with the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan (16 September 2019)
Mr. President, dear Commissioners,
DefendDefenders thanks you for your update. The human rights situation in South Sudan continues to deserve priority attention from this Council and regional bodies and mechanisms.
We welcome the recent positive political developments in South Sudan, including the work being carried out by the National Constitutional Amendment Committee, and the committees composed of military and civilian actors formed to improve civil-military relations and support local justice and reconciliation in Yei River State. Additionally, we welcome the commitment to form a transitional Government by November 2019, following Riek Machar’s recent visit to the country on 11 September 2019. We urge both camps to adhere to this commitment as formation of a unity government will go a long way towards building sustainable peace in the world’s youngest nation.
However, we remain concerned about the limited efforts to address lack of accountability for human rights violations and abuses, including conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence, which remains widespread. Particularly, the failure to establish Chapter Five institutions, including the Hybrid Court, the Commission for Truth, Reconciliation, and Healing, and the Compensation and Reparations Authority is a setback to addressing impunity and ensuring justice for victims. It demonstrates the Government’s disinterest in addressing issues pertaining to restoration and healing, including full rehabilitation of victims and the building of resilience and guarantees of non-recurrence, as civic space and human rights defenders are under pressure. All of these elements add to ongoing concern over delays in implementing transitional security arrangements under Chapter Two of the Revitalised Peace Agreement.
Ahead of this Council’s 43rd session, when a resolution on South Sudan will be considered, we reiterate that there can be no lasting peace without justice.
Thank you for your attention.
Item 2: General Debate (oral update of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights), 10 September 2019
Mr. President, Madam High Commissioner,
DefendDefenders reiterates its support to your “preventative engagement” approach, which has the potential of bringing about tangible results in a number of areas and country situations. As you highlighted in the informal conversation you held on 4 September 2019 with Members and Observers of the Council, where “quiet diplomacy” is not effective, OHCHR action may include more public advocacy. Regarding a number of situations, human rights defenders and civil society need your voice more than ever.
We and the Pan-African Human Rights Defenders Network (AfricanDefenders) remain deeply concerned at the situation in Cameroon, in particular the crisis in the North-West and South-West regions, which deserves the Council’s attention. The Council should exercise its prevention mandate to end violations and contribute to settling the crisis. The Cameroonian Government should respond positively to offers of assistance now – or face stronger multilateral action at a future session.
Regarding Tanzania, we concur with your analysis. The Government should acknowledge the legitimate concerns, expressed by a range of national, regional and international stakeholders, over human rights developments in the country, and accept to engage on the needed reforms, including through amending legislation affecting civic space and the exercise of the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, association, and access to information.
We will address Sudan in the dedicated interactive dialogue. We stress the need for an international inquiry into violations of the rights of peaceful protesters and Sudanese citizens, monitoring and reporting through the extension of the Independent Expert’s mandate, and long-term OHCHR presence on the ground through a country office, to help Sudan implement systemic human rights reforms, including in relation to accountability.
Thank you for your attention.