Sudan: don’t let the military regime use a UN event to legitimise itself

The international community should not allow Sudan’s military regime to use the country’s third Universal Periodic Review (UPR) to gain legitimacy, DefendDefenders said ahead of the review, which is set for 1st February 2022. All states should reject the de facto authorities’ attempt to legally represent Sudan and make clear that the recommendations they formulate as part of the UPR process are ad­dres­sed to the legitimate, transitional government overthrown on 25 October 2021. 

“Business cannot go ahead as usual,” said Hassan Shire, Exe­cu­tive Direc­tor, DefendDefenders. “States should make clear that their participation in the UPR does not mean that they recognise the situation as legal or the military’s claim to represent Sudan as valid.” 

After the coup carried out by the Sudanese military, over 40 civil society organisations called on the UN Human Rights Council to urgently establish a mechanism to “monitor, verify and report” on the situation in Sudan. On 5 November 2021, the Council held a special session on Sudan to ad­dress the human rights implications of the 25 October 2021 military coup. By adopting a resolution that strongly condemned the military takeover and requested the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to designate an expert to monitor the situation in Sudan, the Council ensured scrutiny of the situation. 

Irrespective of the legal implications of the presence of the military regime at Sudan’s desk, if the country’s review goes ahead, then other states should turn it into an opportunity to condemn the illegal acts carried out by the de facto authorities, including the repression of protesters,” said Nicolas Agostini, Representative to the UN for DefendDefenders. 

The UPR is a process set up by the Human Rights Council, the UN’s top human rights body. Every four and a half years, every UN member state undergoes a comprehensive review of its human rights re­cord in a process in which it receives recommendations from other states, which it can accept or reject (“note”). Civil society partici­pates in the process by sub­mitting “alter­na­tive reports” and en­ga­ging in advocacy at the na­tional and UN levels. 

 

For more information, please contact:

Estella Kabachwezi

Advocacy, Research and Communications Manager, DefendDefenders; [email protected] or +256 782 360 460 (English)

Nicolas Agostini

Representative to the United Nations for DefendDefenders; [email protected] or +41 79 813 49 91 (English and French)

MORE NEWS:

Human Rights Defender of the month: Alex Njenga John

Alex Njenga has always believed in egalitarianism both as a principle and as a tool for justice. As a result, he has always been suspicious of, and at times hostile to social prejudices that treat some people as “more equal than others,” – to use a line from George Orwell’s famed political fable, Animal Farm.

Some of the experiences that have shaped his social and political outlook have been personal. As an adolescent in Kenya’s Uasin Gishu County, Alex was stigmatised and denied healthcare after he identified himself as belonging to Kenya’s sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) community.

SHARE WITH FRIENDS: